Brian Mathis wrote:
> With 7.2a now out, I didn't see any mention of support for 64-bit > Windows. Vista (whatever you feel about it) really is the gateway to > 64-bit on the Windows platform. This is my plea that 7.2 supports 64- > bit Windows out of the box. > > All of the work is already done. There is a site here: > http://georgevreilly.com/vim/ > that already works. I sure would like to have an "official" version > though. The changes for 64 bit support were included in the source code. I'm only building the 32 bit version, because it runs everywhere. Hopefully also on Windows 98 and ME after the next build. If you want the 64 bit version you either need to build yourself, or wait for someone (possibly George Reilly) to make a 64 bit version available. Maybe some day we'll include the 64 bit version in the installer, and pick the right executable when doing the install. -- Some of the well know MS-Windows errors: ESLEEP Operator fell asleep ENOERR No error yet EDOLLAR OS too expensive EWINDOWS MS-Windows loaded, system in danger /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
