Derek Tattersall wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 11:05 pm, "Charles E. Campbell, Jr."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm just beginning a semi-automated test suite -- I expect that that
>> will help enormously sometime in the misty future.  I'll be going
>> through the commands and trying to build the tests, checking netrw as I
>> go.  However, for now:
>>
>> Please test netrw v126g!  Its available via my website:  
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#NETRW
>>     
> Note that v 126 fails when used with vim 7.1.330.  The error message
> disappeared too quickly for me to capture it.
> Will progression to v 126 cause vim 7.1 to become unusable?
>   
>> Bram would like netrw released so he can release vim 7.2b and I'm going
>> to be gone for two weeks starting next week (and will be nowhere near
>> electricity let alone a computer).  The changes have been to put
>> fnameescape()s and shellescape()s in where appropriate -- so you'll need
>> vim 7.2a with patches 1-13 (its up to #16 as of this writing).
>>
>> I'm planning on releasing netrw to Bram at the end of this week.
>>     
v126g (and later) will require vim 7.2a.13 (or later).

v7.1 of vim comes with an earlier version of netrw that works with 
v7.1.  Once a release has been made, that release is no longer modified, 
so vim v7.1 is not going to be "unusable" -- its as usable now as ever.

It does mean that you can't upgrade v7.1 with plugins that use new 
features, one of which is improved security functions.  The 
shellescape() function, in particular, was itself upgraded in v7.2a's 
patch#13.  Netrw v126g uses that enhancement, hence to use it requires 
the upgraded vim.

Regards,
Chip Campbell


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui