Matt Wozniski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > >> I'm seeing your message and I don't know the answer. Do you want a >> similar message from everyone who doesn't know the answer? >> > > Naturally not; your response was far more wasteful than my post > already, and not just because of wasting twice as many bytes. My post > was an obvious attempt to get confirmation from Bram that he has seen > this and to ascertain whether he agrees, disagrees, or is or is not > considering this simple patch. Your post, on the other hand, > contributed nothing whatsoever. > <snip>
Your "re-ping" contributed nothing whatsover; if you wanted a response directly from Bram, it would've been better to re-send the message directly to him. Your original request, as far as trackability/history/etc, was reasonable IMHO to have put on the list. Chip Campbell --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
