Hello, Vimmers.
My friend and I noticed a strange behavior of Vim on foldings.
From :help 'foldopen':
> When the command is part of a mapping this option is not used.
For exmaple, with the following setting:
noremap g/ :<C-u>set incsearch<Return>/
folds will be opened by '/' but not opened by 'g/'. That's okay.
This behavior is the same as noted in :help.
But with the following settings:
noremap! ; <Return>
noremap! <Return> ;
folds will not be opened by BOTH '/' and 'g/'! Entering {pattern}
for '/' is usually finished by <Return>, but with the above
settings <Return> is mapped from ';'. It seems to be the cause of
this behavior.
I believe that Vim should open folds in this case, because the
conditions to open folds should determined by how {motion}
commands are invoked, not how {pattern}s are inputed. The
following is a small patch to fix this problem:
*** ../vim-7.2b.002/src/normal.c Sun Sep 7 18:42:43 2008
--- src/normal.c Thu Sep 11 09:09:26 2008
***************
*** 6076,6081 ****
--- 6076,6082 ----
cmdarg_T *cap;
{
oparg_T *oap = cap->oap;
+ int save_KeyTyped;
if (cap->cmdchar == '?' && cap->oap->op_type == OP_ROT13)
{
***************
*** 6086,6092 ****
--- 6087,6095 ----
return;
}
+ save_KeyTyped = KeyTyped;
cap->searchbuf = getcmdline(cap->cmdchar, cap->count1, 0);
+ KeyTyped = save_KeyTyped;
if (cap->searchbuf == NULL)
{
Anyway, is this behavior intentional one? If so, why Vim behaves
as this?
--
To Vim, or not to Vim.
kana <http://whileimautomaton.net/>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
