Hello Tony, It's really to be the similar problem, but this one only arise under Windows operating system, the UTF-16le BOM problem is platform independence. I was uncertain wherher a combined patch was convenient.
On 2008-10-22 23:21:11, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > I expect this is related with the UTF-16le BOM problem you noticed this > past Saturday. Maybe a combined patch would be OK, since in both cases, > the problem involves using UCS-2 (where surrogates are undefined) > instead of UTF-16 (where surrogate pairs encode codepoints above the BMP)? Best regards, Yanwei. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
