Kana Natsuno wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder if the name "v:motion_force" is the best choice. Does someone
> > know a better name?
>
> Though I also (and still) wonder about that, I chose the name from
> the definition of struct oparg_S in src/structs.h which has the member
> "motion_force" to contain the information about this problem.
I understand. But this is a user facing name, what's used in the C code
is not that important.
Reading the help for o_v and around, we don't actually force the motion,
but the motion type. "v:force_motiontype" ?
--
FATHER: We are here today to witness the union of two young people in the
joyful bond of the holy wedlock. Unfortunately, one of them, my son
Herbert, has just fallen to his death.
[Murmurs from CROWD; the BRIDE smiles with relief, coughs.]
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
