Christian MICHON, 22.01.2009: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Markus Heidelberg > <markus.heidelb...@web.de> wrote: > > Christian MICHON, 21.01.2009: > >> sending a git-bundle to a repo maintainer is actually better than > >> sending patches. my 2 cents :) > > > > Maybe, I don't have experience with git-bundles. But why then is all the > > git development done with either applying patches or pulling from repos? > > I guess bundles can only work, if the bundle creator is the only one > > committing to the corresponding branches. > > the beauty of git-bundles is when you are behind strong firewalls.
OK, that's a point. But if you find a mail with a git-bundle in a list archive, please show me :) > Of course, the reason why people use patches is historical And for review. > when I send patches from gmail, if they're not as attachment they > become corrupted :( (long line limit is at 70 characters). Then why send from gmail at all? The web frontend of my provider is not better, so I only use it, if necessary and I'm not at home. > no, anyone can pull (fetch+merge) bundles in any branch or repo as > they want: it's not the creator that has to do the merge. Oh, you're right. It's just the same as a pull from an online repo. Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
