James Vega, 06.02.2009: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > What do you think about the commit message format, is it ok? I searched > > for a git-like message, without losing information. The duplicated first > > line of the problem description is unavoidable I think, because it > > should be fully automated and the first line shouldn't merely contain > > the patch number. > > Using 7.2.093 as an example, here's what I use for the upstream branch > of the Debian repo: > > [7.2.093] (extra) dialogs can't always handle multi-byte text
I decided to discard the (extra) or (after 7.2.xxx) comments in the summary. But to not lose information, I put this > Patch 7.2.093 (extra) at the last line. This isn't very nice, but the summary line will stay below 80 chars with the automated extraction of the complete first "Problem" line. But why this "extra" and the distinction between Unix and non-Unix at all? Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
