I would appreciate it if a few people can try out this patch and tell me
if this doesn't trigger any errors or warnings. The more unusual your
compiler is the more useful the information. I already tried gcc 4.3.3,
where it avoids a warning when compiling with -Wextra.
*** ../vim-7.2.173/src/eval.c 2009-04-22 16:07:57.000000000 +0200
--- src/eval.c 2009-05-15 20:12:23.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 283,289 ****
#define VV_RO 2 /* read-only */
#define VV_RO_SBX 4 /* read-only in the sandbox */
! #define VV_NAME(s, t) s, {{t}}, {0}
static struct vimvar
{
--- 283,289 ----
#define VV_RO 2 /* read-only */
#define VV_RO_SBX 4 /* read-only in the sandbox */
! #define VV_NAME(s, t) s, {{t, 0, {0}}, 0, {0}}, {0}
static struct vimvar
{
--
Why is "abbreviation" such a long word?
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
