Ben Fritz wrote:
> On May 24, 8:13=A0am, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wonder if this is the right way to solve it. =A0Perhaps when reloading = > a > > buffer we should "lock" the folding? =A0In fact all window-local stuff > > should be locked. > > > > The ultimate solution would be to stop using an arbitrary window for > > executing the buffer autocommands. Unfortunately one can write > > autocommands that break when using some kind of hidden window. > > > > So is this a related problem to this thread? > > http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/browse_thread/thread/8fef0e8b1d135de9/a0e26140be70c8fe > > If so, it sounds more insidious than I thought! Yes, that's related. It basically means it's very easy to write bad autocommands. -- Your company is doomed if your primary product is overhead transparencies. (Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle) /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
