On Mon 14 Sep 2009 at 16:45:36 +0200, Milan Vancura wrote: > Unfortunately I don't have plain 'vi' here so I don't know how it behaves in > the same situation. But at least the vim behaviour or documentation is not > correct. And, if possible, I vote for the behaviour from documentation, of > course.
FreeBSD nvi Version 1.79 (10/23/96): "Hello" NetBSD nvi Version 1.79nb16 (10/23/96): "Hello" NetBSD nvi Version nvi-1.81.6nb1 (2007-11-18): "Hello" Nvi also complains that 'Buffer " is empty' if you try ""p . My Ultrix machine is off so I can't test *real* vi... -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- You author it, and I'll reader it. \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- Cetero censeo "authored" delendum esse. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
