Bot Hiestand wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Bram Moolenaar<[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Here's a probably better patch, and a test case to show the behavior I > > > >> expect from exists() with respect to autocommands: > > > > > > > > Thanks for the patch and testcase script. Would you be able to turn > > the > > > > script into a test for src/testdir? That will greatly help avoid > > > > regressions. > > > > > > Sure, something like the following? > > > > Looks good. > > > > To make it a bit easier to locate any exists() that doesn't do what was > > expected, can you make it: > > > > :call add(results, '##BufEnter: ' + exists('##BufEnter')) > > > > > Sure, a revised patch is attached. I had already done this myself, since it was simple. It is in patch 7.2.259. Please have a look and let me know if something can be improved. -- Marriage isn't a word. It's a sentence. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
