Roland Puntaier wrote:
> > In the source code changes I notice you now define FEAT_PYTHON3, but > > there is no FEAT_PYTHON2. I would think we need both, since we can have > > Vim with: > > - only Python 2 (current situation) > > - only Python 3 (future) > > - both Python 2 and 3 > > FEAT_PYTHON corresponds to FEAT_PYTHON2. You could rename it. Aren't there multiple places with #if defined(FEAT_PYTHON) || defined(FEAT_PYTHON3) I think having FEAT_PYTHON for any version avoids confusion. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 266. You hear most of your jokes via e-mail instead of in person. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
