Lech Lorens schrieb: > 2009/9/30 Andy Wokula <[email protected]>: >> Bram Moolenaar schrieb: > [...] >>> But when the cursor is on the line with "silent" there is no error and >> ... because the :substitute succeeds (to explain it to myself and a few >> others). >> >>> the bug isn't trigerred. >> Which bug? Do you want to disallow this valid :subst-syntax? > > Instead of giving arguments against the fix you might want to try to > reproduce the problem. Like dr-dr xp explained, the problem is that > after the exception is thrown, whatever you type in the command line > is not displayed.
I was just curious and took the risk of giving a dumb argument, hoping somebody like you will point me to the right direction ... Think I got it: The "bug" was introduced with a later patch (maybe the patch adding the :unsilent command) and I forgot that I can't reproduce it with my older version. -- Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
