Hi, Andre Massing wrote: > > I just occured a possible bug in vim. Instead of search and replace via > the substiute command I performed a macro record, recording a search > :/STRING > and a > ce > and typing something. > If I execute the recorded macro, it does not open the fold after jumping > to the found location and therefore deletes the whole line instead of > only the word. That is strange, since the foldopen option contains > search and works as expected outside macros. Is this behaviour known?
yes, and it's not a bug. It's even documented at :help 'foldopen' Scroll down and have a look at the first paragraph after the allowed items for 'foldopen'. Regards, Jürgen -- Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. (Calvin) -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
