Hi,
> In many places in the code _WIN64 is checked for, but the list for has()
> uses WIN64.
>
> Perhaps we should change them all to WIN64 to be consistent with WIN32,
> and then define WIN64 in vim.h when _WIN64 is defined.
That will be inconsistent with WIN32 because it is defined in Makefile :)
What about changing all occurrences of _WIN64 to WIN64 and defining
WIN64 in makefile?
On second thought, I don't like either ways. It seems more consistent
to change the single occurrence of WIN64 in eval.c to _WIN64. Anyway,
64-bit binary returns 1 for has("win32") so we don't have to make
WIN64 to behave like another WIN32.
--
Sergey Khorev
http://sites.google.com/site/khorser
Can anybody think of a good tagline I can steal?
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
