On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Scanning the ftplugins, it seems 'flexwiki' is the only one which sets > > 'bomb'. Is it an ok thing for it to do? Also, why is "flexwiki" the > > handler, when wikipedia is probably the most widely used wiki? But > > that's a quibble. > > Setting 'bomb' is weird. Unless the filetype requires the file to be > written in utf-8 for the file to be working properly. > > George, is setting 'bomb' really required? If so, how can we avoid that > this happens when the flexwiki filetype is detected when it's actually > another kind of file? > > As a guard, 'bomb' should only be set when 'encoding' is utf-8. > This applies to 'fileencoding' as well. > > At the time of writing the www.flexwiki.com site was not available, thus > I could not check any specification there. I haven't used Flexwiki in 3 years, so I forget the details of why 'bomb' was needed. I think Flexwiki is dead or nearly so. It seems like mapping .wiki files to wikipedia (MediaWiki?) rather than Flexwiki is far more useful. Feel free to remove the flexwiki mapping from ftplugin.vim. -- /George V. Reilly [email protected] Twitter: @georgevreilly http://www.georgevreilly.com/blog http://blogs.cozi.com/tech -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
