Milan Vancura wrote:
> > I will try to include a few patches that have been pending for a while.
> > I don't have much time available, thus I will only include things that
> > take a few hours of my time. That basically means patches that are
> > ready to be included.
>
> Hi Bram,
>
> I resend my fixes of test29 and also a patch replacing O(n2) algorithm
> of line join by O(n) one. There are no significant changes in those
> patches since I published them on this list in past, they are just
> updated to current vim73 sources from mercurial.
>
> A fix of test29 is straigthforward, it is clear that (and how) it was
> wrong.
>
> A line join algorithm replacement may be considered as a feature but
> it was tested for a long time by all users of git branch vim-extended
> with no negative report for all that time.
>
> May you include them in vim 7.3, please?
I'll update the todo list for these patches.
I have a long list of patches that could be included, I'll have to stop
some time, otherwise 7.3 never gets done.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
59. Your wife says communication is important in a marriage...so you buy
another computer and install a second phone line so the two of you can
chat.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
