On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >> ... > > I would add not only .*.swp but even .*.sw? (to ignore .swo .swn etc.), > src/auto/config.mk (which is regenerated by configure from the > config.mk.dist and a couple of others) and runtime/doc/tags (which is > regenerated by make install). However, maybe I'm talking from a "provincial" > Linux standpoint: I'm fairly certain that users of makefiles other than > Makefile don't need src/auto/config.mk but what about the help tags? I guess > all makefiles "ought" to rebuild them at some point but do they?
src/auto/config.mk and runtime/doc/tags are under mercurial control, they sould not be added to .hgignore (or they should be removed from mercurial control): $ hg locate | grep "config.mk$" src/auto/config.mk $ hg locate | grep "runtime.*tags$" runtime/doc/tags > Ah, and shadow directories. In theory they can be named anything (below src/ > ) but the default is src/shadow and I propose to also "ignore" src/shadow-* > in case someone had several shadow directories -- with a notice somewhere > (maybe as a comment in either or both of the src/Makefile and .hgignore) > that shadow-<something> is the preferred name. Then src/runtime and > src/pixmaps (softlinks created by make shadow) and src/cscope.out (just to > be on the safe side in case someone built a cscope database for the Vim > source). I suggest to add also src/tags. > What have we forgotten? Ah yes, src/auto/if_perl.c (on Linux) and > src/if_perl.c (on Windows). Is that all now? Xavier -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
