On 1 June 2010 04:47, Benjamin Fritz <[email protected]> wrote: > I love using the :TOhtml command, and I keep finding more ways to use > it. Recently, I had a large-ish log file (several thousand lines), in > which I wanted to call attention to a few groups of lines, but I > figured people may want the context as well. So, I set up some folds > and some quick syntax highlighting, and went to go create an html copy > of it using the "dynamic folding" feature of the command. > > Unfortunately, I discovered that processing such a large file, even > with no syntax highlighting, takes a *very* long time. I probably > should have selected just a smaller area of interest but... > > I waited quite a while, and finally hit CTRL-C to stop it. Luckily it > hadn't actually gotten that far (probably about 30%), but I was > worried that it may have been almost done, and all I needed to do was > wait a bit longer. > > So anyway, for future use, I wanted to be able to see quickly whether > the conversion was worth waiting for. Therefore, I have written a > patch to add a progress indicator. When I opened the file, I noticed > that indentation is quite a mess (a mix of tabs and spaces, sometimes > in the same line), so I also fixed that up (by using gg=G with noet, > sw=2, sts=2, and ts=2). For clarity, I ran the diff on the file > *after* fixing the ident. > > Since the indentation patch is actually *larger* than the file itself, > I have just attached the fully patched file instead of a patch. This > will also make it easier for Windows users to try :-) > > Please comment...especially if you know of a better way to accomplish > something similar. I tried using :echon to draw the progress bar, but > the echo was being cleared each time through the main loop, so I > switched to using :echo with a string that is gradually built as the > script processes.
I tried it on Windows, and the display was too flashy and intrusive. I can't say I like it. And there was nothing to "fix" about the tabs. They were perfectly fine. Tabstop was set to the default (8), and only shiftwidth was set to 2 (along with sts, which does not affect the saved file). You seemed to have confused them. The original version is easier to view (using type/cat/more/less or nearly anything). -- Wu Yongwei URL: http://wyw.dcweb.cn/ -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
