Ben Fritz wrote:

> I only recently started using undo branches, thanks to my discovery of
> the histwin plugin:
>
> http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2932
>
> With :earlier 1file being available, which would probably involve
> appropriate (parseable) markers, I imagine this plugin could readily
> be expanded to show these file tags, giving you even more information
> to help determine what state the times on the branches actually
> correspond to.

I find the undo branches very nice but also hard to use in practice.
I tend to get lost where I am in the tree when using :undo or :earlier
commands.  Currently, the ":undolist" command only shows something
like this:

  :undolist
  number changes time
  1          15  08:53:07
  5          18  08:53:20
  7          14  08:53:29

Would it be possible to draw the structure of the undo tree?
What about the following mock up (use a fixed size font to properly
view the ASCII art):

  :undolist
  number changes time
  1          15  08:53:07  <--3--o-------------12-->
  5          18  08:53:20        \--1--S-------14-->
  7          14  08:53:29              \--8--*--2-->


Where:
  <  ... is a root node in the tree. There is generally only 1 root node
         as in above example. However, because of limited undo levels,
         there can also be more than root node.
  o  ... is a node in the undo tree from which multiple sub-branches start.
  \  ... is the start of a sub-branch.
  >  ... is a leaf node in the undo tree.
  S  ... is the tag of node where file was last (S)aved.
  *  ... is the current position in the undo tree. It is often located on
         a leaf. However, when using :undo or :earlier commands, it may not
         be located on a leaf. In above example, user has undone 2 changes
         from the leaf in last branch so * is not located on a leaf.

The numbers represent the number of intermediate changes between
nodes o \ > S * in undo tree.

I realize that drawing the undo tree may be tricky when the undo tree
becomes large: it may then not fit on the width of the screen.  In that
case, it could be truncated.

It would make the undo tree structure more intuitive.
What do you think?

-- Dominique

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Raspunde prin e-mail lui