On 9 June 2010 17:10, James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:41 AM, björn wrote:
>> On 8 June 2010 23:05, James Vega wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:42 PM, björn wrote:
>>>
>>>> My config.log looks like this:
>>>>
>>>> configure:11865: checking for off_t
>>>> configure:11895: gcc -c -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -Wall  -DMACOS_X_UNIX
>>>> -no-cpp-precomp conftest.c >&5
>>>> configure:11901: $? = 0
>>>> configure:11916: result: yes
>>>>
>>>> It seems that it never even tries to figure out the proper size.
>>>
>>> That's the only occurence of off_t?  The size checking is performed much
>>> later than checking for the existence of off_t.
>>
>> Yes, that is the only occurrence of off_t.  But...it seems the problem
>> stems from the fact I use autoconf 2.61 to generate src/configure (I
>> have to generate this file since my configure.in contains
>> modifications for MacVim).  See my previous post in reply to Tony.
>
> That's odd.  The AC_CHECK_SIZEOF macro has been in Autoconf since 2.50.
> I just tested on Debian Etch (since that has Autoconf 2.61) and
> running "make autoconf" generates a configure that detects off_t size.

Reading this I decided to try running "autoconf" followed by "make
autoconf" and now off_t is detected properly(!).  I have no idea why
it did not work earlier (I did run those two commands earlier, but
perhaps not one after the other in that order)...

This makes me wonder: What is the correct incantation for generating
the configure scripts after I've modified src/configure.in?  Both
"autoconf" and "make autoconf"?  (The Makefile makes it sound like the
latter should be enough but that does not pick up on changes to
configure.in.)

Björn

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Raspunde prin e-mail lui