Why no responce? =( Ciss: > Thank's a lot for reposting. > > Also i want add some comment. > > I want to add some additional features into vim. > and i want to do this with ruby support. > > ruby 1.8 is not so fast. But 1.9 version has some cool improve about > speed issue. (5x faster) > > it will be great - to have native Ruby1.9 support. > > Sorry for english, i'm from Russia. > > On 9 июн, 09:28, "George V. Reilly" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Ciss <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think what i can't create new thread in vim dev channel. > > > Please, maybe anyone transfer my suggest to vim developers? > > > > Perhaps you're not a member of the vim_dev group? > > I tried building Vim with Ruby 1.9 on Windows a few weeks ago. Unlike > > Ruby 1.8, it simply wasn't possible with the MSVC compiler, because > > 1.9 came with include files and libs for MinGW only. > > Vim can be built with either MSVC or MinGW, but the official Windows > > builds have always been built with MSVC. > > It'd certainly be nice to have Ruby 1.9 be the default. > > -- > > /George V. Reilly [email protected] Twitter: > > @georgevreillyhttp://www.georgevreilly.com/blog http://blogs.cozi.com/tech
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
