Charles Peacech wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Tux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Charles schrob am 30.06.2010 16:35:
> >
> > It is provided here
> > http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/download/release.html
> >
> > I begin to despair, seriously. This one "works" but does not really like VS
> > 2008 (read: won't compile). Ruby 1.8 did.
>
> Going futher, the problem also lies on if_ruby.c
>
> #ifdef _WIN32
> /* suggested by Ariya Mizutani */
> int argc = 1;
> char *argv[] = {"gvim.exe"};
> NtInitialize(&argc, &argv);
> #endif
> #ifdef RUBY19_OR_LATER
> RUBY_INIT_STACK;
> #endif
>
> while RUBY_INIT_STACK is defined as
>
> #define RUBY_INIT_STACK VALUE variable_in_this_stack_frame;
> ruby_init_stack(&variable_in_this_stack_frame);
>
> This results in declaration after expression which is C99 standard and
> not supported by VS C compiler which only supports C89 standard.
How about doing it this way:
#ifdef DYNAMIC_RUBY
if (ruby_enabled(TRUE))
{
#endif
#ifdef _WIN32
/* suggested by Ariya Mizutani */
int argc = 1;
char *argv[] = {"gvim.exe"};
NtInitialize(&argc, &argv);
#endif
{
#ifdef RUBY19_OR_LATER
RUBY_INIT_STACK;
#endif
ruby_init();
}
#ifdef RUBY19_OR_LATER
ruby_script("vim-ruby");
In other programs I often see RUBY_INIT_STACK and ruby_init() right
after each other, must be intentionally so.
--
Vi is clearly superior to emacs, since "vi" has only two characters
(and two keystrokes), while "emacs" has five. (Randy C. Ford)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
