On Jul 15, 5:33 am, Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > How do you think putting the name of syntax into html file generated by > TOhtml? > Following patch does it. >
What purpose does this serve? I'm not necessarily opposed to including it, but I'm not sure why it's needed. At a glance, I don't see any problems with the patch itself, and the meta tag should not affect anything visible in a browser. There is one difficulty, though, which your patch does not address. Recendly added in the version 7.3 runtime is the ability to generate a "diff view" which takes all diff'ed windows and puts them side-by-side in a table on a single page. This is a very nice feature, but what should we do for the syntax? It should be pretty easy to do a comma-separated list showing the syntax for each window. Would that meet your needs? -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
