On 19 July 2010 18:28, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Björn Winckler wrote: >> On 19 July 2010 16:59, björn <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > There's only one file. To double check I renamed the file >> > "appkitborkborkbork.h" (I know for sure there is no other file called >> > that on my filesystem) and I get >> > >> > :tabf ap >> > apache2/ appkitborkborkbork.h applicatives.hs >> > appkitborkborkbork.h applicatives.hs apr-1/ >> > >> > However, If I use :f the situation changes (I just noticed this)! >> > >> > :f app >> > appkitborkborkbork.h applicatives.hs >> >> To clarify: in the second example I actually typed ":f ap" and it >> completed to ":f app" ignoring the previous matches from >> "/usr/include". So it seems ":f" ignores 'path' whereas 'tabf' >> doesn't. > > :f is short for :file, not :find. > :tabf is short for :tabfind. > :find needs to be typed as :fin or :find.
Oh, I didn't realize that. Well, I can confirm that ":fin" behaves identical to ":tabf" (duplicate entries). Björn -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
