On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > I can't see anything wrong: > > - hg diff shows me no file differences between the latest two > changesets, which is the desired effect; > - hg heads shows only one head per branch, the "default" branch head > being the new changeset, which is again the desired effect; > - hg branches shows vim (near the base of the tree), vim72, vim73 and > default, each pointing to the expected changesets (the same ones as > shown by "hg heads"); the vim73 branch is listed as "inactive" because > it has a child (in the default branch). All this looks normal to me.
This seems abnormal to me, but it might be my own semantic dissonance with hg... Shouldn't current development be on the vim73 branch? Can the vim73 branch not be equivalent to the default branch? (Can a branch in hg have multiple names?) Can the vim73 branch just be used as the default (without calling it 'default')? I would expect there to be a tag that could get you vim 7.3(.0.0) if you wanted it, but it seems weird that there are new patches (releases) of vim 7.3 with the vim73 branch being "inactive". -- Best, Ben -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
