> Ruby 1.9.1 or Ruby 1.9.2? Or did you compile with the *.h include files > of 1.9.2 (from C:\ruby192\include or wherever) and try to run with the > 1.9.1 DLL? >
Compiled with 1.9.2's *.h and the only Ruby DLL on PATH is the 1.9.2 DLL named msvcrt-ruby191.dll As Leo replied, 1.9.2 is "library compatible" with 1.9.1 so the key is to point RUBY to the 1.9.2 root dir but then view RUBY_VER and RUBY_VER_LONG as a library compatibility version since the source directories on 1.9.2 use 1.9.1. Interesting, I know, it tripped me up on early compile attempts with strange errors, but here's ruby-core's FAQ entry in their 1.9.2 announcement http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2010/08/18/ruby-1-9-2-is-released/ I haven't had a chance to look at if_ruby.c starting here http://code.google.com/p/vim/source/browse/src/if_ruby.c#412 -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
