(Re-sending my reply, I accidentally set this directly to Bram instead of to the list.)
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Few people complain, thus it's not that wrong. How about disabling the > logic when the number of colors is more than 16? > > -- > hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: > 104. When people ask about the Presidential Election you ask "Which country?" > > /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ > /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ > \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// > \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// > I don't think the number of people complaining is a legitimate measure in this case. Few people understand what 'background' is for or notice when it changes or understand why. The proportion of terminal-supporting color schemes that exhibit the problem would probably be a reasonable measure, and if it will affect your decision I'd be willing to do some research on that. However, it makes no sense to accept code that is sometimes wrong when it has no benefit, so I re-raise the question from my initial report: Is there some benefit? -Kevin -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
