Jakson Alves de Aquino wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Till Maas <[email protected]> wrote: >> I use a shared additional vim spell file that contains word marked as bad >> like 'foo/!'. For words that can be written in different correct ways, >> which at least exists in German, sometimes one of both variants is marked >> as bad to help writing uniform texts. To distinguish these explicit bad >> words from words that are not known by the wordlist and therefore marked >> as bad, it woulc be nice to have a different highlight group in vim for >> these kind of words like SpellExplicitBad or something better named. > > Vim can highlight "rare" words in a different color. The problem is > that, currently, rare word are considered good if they are also listed > as good words. I have written a small patch to increase the priority > of rare words and posted it in this list before. I think the patch > does what you want:
Yes, I guess the patch would work for the described use case, but it makes the process more complicated, since I do not want to manually change the bad words marked using "zw" as rare words by editing the spell file. Also I want to use this feature for words that are not recognized as bad spelled by people who think it needs to be spelled the bad way and therefore add it as good word to the shared spell file. If they get notified that it is intentionally marked as bad, they might not do this. Regards Till -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
