Reply to message «Re: Wish: <range>», sent 15:22:29 09 April 2011, Saturday by Tony Mechelynck:
> Could you give a use case which would not work just as well with either
> -range or -range=% ? You'd have to use that range somewhere.
>
> Maybe you could use :0command for your special case? That range is
> allowed, but for some commands it is not meaningful.
If I understood him correctly, he wants to write `<range>' where now you write
`<line1>,<line2>', like this:
command -range Foo <range>call s:Foo()
instead of
command -range Foo <line1>,<line2>call s:Foo()
.
Original message:
> On 09/04/11 10:57, Andy Wokula wrote:
> > I'd appreciate a <range> argument that can be used like
> > <line1>,<line2>
> > but which is empty when no range was given.
> >
> > I'm talking about
> >
> > :h :command-range
>
> Could you give a use case which would not work just as well with either
> -range or -range=% ? You'd have to use that range somewhere.
>
> Maybe you could use :0command for your special case? That range is
> allowed, but for some commands it is not meaningful.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Tony.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
