On 06/05/11 09:50, Andy Spencer wrote:
[...]
[1] http://andy753421.ath.cx/linked/vim-new.png
[...]
hm, IMHO with icons of that size the new icon looks better than the old
one, because of the pixelization of the "im" in the latter. Maybe we
should be given the opportunity to see the proposed new icon in various
sizes, starting with all existing sizes of the present icon (the runtime
folder in the source tree includes gif, png and xpm icons at sizes
16x16, 32x32 and 48x48 pixels, plus a "Vim the editor" logo sized 60px
high and 125px wide in various formats; then there still is a rather
good "Vim" logo on the wiki even if nowadays not every wiki visitor may
be conscious of its existence [size 135x155px, maybe including some
margin space]: http://images.wikia.com/vim/images/b/bc/Wiki.png -- I've
looked at the latter at different zoom factors, and it looks very good
from 50% to 150% with no noticeable pixelization; at larger sizes [200%,
300%] pixelization starts being visible but IMHO not disturbingly so).
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Conway's Law:
In any organization there will always be one person who knows
what is going on.
This person must be fired.
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
