Christian Brabandt wrote: > On So, 22 Mai 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > It's true that using ";" after a "t" command is currently close to > > useless. Changing this would be backwards incompatible, but I doubt > > anyone would notice. I hardly use ";" anyway. Would there be any > > plugin that breaks? I can't think of a reason why a plugin would rely on > > ";" not moving. > > > > So I tend to think I would include such a patch. > > Ok, here is the patch. I made it so that only including the ';' in 'cpo' > would change the behaviour. If you don't want to introduce a new 'cpo' > setting, I am fine with simply changing the current implementation. The > comment should explain how it works.
Thanks. I think the behavior should be default in 'nocompatible' mode. Please add a test for the new behavior, and sticking to the old behavior when ';' is in 'cpo'. -- Common sense is what tells you that the world is flat. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
