Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On 28/05/11 19:59, Danek Duvall wrote: > > >Or perhaps there's a smooth, generic patch-flow I'm not seeing where this > >problem isn't actually a problem. > > See http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Getting_the_Vim_source_with_Mercurial
Yes, I can do that, but our build infrastructure is currently designed with tarballs and patches in mind, not SCMs. That said, using an SCM URL in place of a tarball URL is something I've wanted for a while, so perhaps I should spend some time designing that into the tools if vim's tarball/patch model is broken. Thanks, Danek -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
