On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
From my reading of http://unicode.org/reports/tr11/, none of these
characters should be considered to be of ambiguous width (they should all
be single-width).
In whatever font rxvt-unicode is currently using, ₁₂₃₄ indeed shows up
incorrectly. (even outside of Vim). Is this something that changed?
[Referent was unclear... I meant:]
Did the ambiguous width status of ₁₂₃₄ change in a recent Unicode
version?
Maybe Vim just needs its tables updated.
--
Best,
Ben
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
