On Sep 24, 3:28 pm, Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Ben, Bram and list, > :TOhtml does not take the spell checking info into account. Therefore, > here is a patch, that makes 2html aware of the syntax highlighting for > SpellBad, SpellRare, SpellLocal and SpellCaps > > It does this by using a simple gif file and using a css property of > 'background: url(file), bottom repeat-x' For ease of use, it uses the > gif file base64 encoded inside the html file, so no separate image file > is needed in addition to the generated html file. The only problem is, > the colors are fixed to the ones, vim uses with the default color scheme > (e.g. red curly line for SpellBad, blue curly line for SpellCap, magenta > colored for SpellRare and cyan colored for SpellLocal). > > All words that need to be highlighted using one of the Spelling > highlighting will get a <span id=SpellBad> tag around it. > > The gif file was take away from the tinymce� project (which is LGPL > licensed) and color converted to all needed colors by me and finally > base64 encoded. > > regards, > Christian > > �)http://www.tinymce.com/
(encoding screwup from google groups interface again, ugh) Thanks, I'll take a look. I was trying to figure out a good way to incorporate the guisp highlight (turned off by default). But, I'm not very fond of the idea of including base64-encoded stuff into the output. Primarily at the moment that's because I don't really fully grasp what that means (just through not attempting to learn about it yet). Eventually I may revisit that, especially since Zyx's plugin does this for images in the signs column IIUC. I agree with Bram though that mostly the reason to use TOhtml is (probably) to share the output with others, and for this use spelling mistakes and the like are normally distracting at best. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
