agentsmith wrote:
Hello, Charles!
I have elaborated a bit on the differences between my home vim version
and the current version. As a result I've found that g:netrw_winsize
was initialized by 25 in new version, diff :
< if !exists("g:netrw_winsize")
< let g:netrw_winsize= ""
< endif
---
> call s:NetrwInit("g:netrw_winsize",25)
so I tried to pass<< let g:netrw_winsize="">> to my .vimrc file and
the Vex behavior turned back to normal!
Thees are the versions of vim73/autoload/netrw.vim file.
< " Date: Oct 23, 2008
< " Version: 134
---
> " Date: Jul 27, 2010
> " Version: 140
7c7
< " Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2008 Charles E. Campbell, Jr.
{{{1
---
> " Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2010 Charles E. Campbell, Jr.
{{{1
And, according to the header, I suppose you did this changes.
Netrw v143 has call s:NetrwInit("g:netrw_winsize",50) ; ie. 50%. That's
because g:netrw_winsize applies to both horizontal and vertical splits;
so 25 columns vs 25 rows can be rather different, visually, but 25%
gives a more consistent feel.
Since g:netrw_winsize is supposed to be numeric, I haven't considered
what netrw will do when its set to an empty string.
Regards,
C Campbell
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
