Hi Peter!
On Fr, 18 Nov 2011, Peter Odding wrote:
> >>Anyway in the worst case I'll just disable syntax folding for buffers
> >>where line('$')> 1000 holds. At least then I still get to enjoy all of
> >>the other goodies Vim has to offer. I'm definitely not switching back to
> >>an IDE :-P. I'll keep vim-dev up to date in case I make any progress on
> >>this issue.
> >
> >I think another good worst-case workaround, would be to enable syntax
> >folding for the initial buffer load, then switch to manual. Folds
> >won't update, but the folds present when opening the file will at
> >least be there. You could even switch to syntax folding and back to
> >manual again on a BufWritePost autocmd to refresh the folds at a point
> >in your editing where they should be pretty stable.
> >
> >Still not as good as fixing the underlying issue, obviously.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, that's much better than just disabling
> syntax folding altogether! I actually think I won't mind that much
> if the folding is only updated when I :write.
Has anybody an easy to reproduce example of the problem?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
