On Jan 2, 9:41 pm, Steve Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > > No policy, but I'd be curious to know what the OP believes to be > practically accomplished with signed files. Perhaps we're just talking > about the official binaries? Or just checksums? >
Maybe so you can install on Windows without the "are you sure you want to run this file from an unverifiable source?". If it were signed I think it would be a less scary message. Personally I don't really care :-) -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
