On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 08:06:09PM -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > > >But, according to comments in the files, there are already files > >being distributed with Vim that are GPLv2-licensed (and not > >Vim/GPL dual-licensed, AFAICT): > > > >[...] > > > >And under src/: > >src/sha256.c > > Sorry: src/sha256.c just has mention of GPL (no version specified). > Though later authors claim Vim licensing. (Which, AFAIK, isn't > something you can do: non-GPL license something that's been GPL'ed.)
As long everyone that has copyright claims on the work agrees, future releases of a work can be released under whatever license the authors want. -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
