> For consistency we need to mention the second argument as optional. I > think it's fine, the user will want to read the detailed explanation > anyway. > > For the code: It duplicates very similar code in three places. Can you > make this a function that accepts an argument that specifies the operation? > > It would also be better to compute the result in a local variable and > assign it to rettv->vval.v_number at the end.
Thanks for your replies. https://gist.github.com/1767460 https://raw.github.com/gist/1767460/gistfile1.diff Done. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
