On Feb 14, 11:45 am, Ernie Rael <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/13/2012 2:36 PM, Dominique Pellé wrote:> since realloc() can only be > faster than ... > > Perhaps "can not be slower than" is more accurate
Disregarding function call overheads, I agree. I can imagine scenarios with the heap being heavily fragmented, maybe in a very long running vim instance, where realloc is forced to move and copy. I agree, Dominique, that replacing arithmetic growth with geometric is complementary and a good idea. Regards, John -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
