David Pope wrote:

> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:54:09 PM UTC-4, Craig Barkhouse wrote:
> 
> > The mch_is_linked() function in os_win32.c only checks if there is
> > more than one hard link (i.e. name) for the file.  It doesn't check
> > if the file is a symbolic link.  By contrast the Unix code does
> > check if the file is a symbolic link.
> > 
> > Sounds like a TODO item.
> 
> Hello all, did this ever get turned into a TODO item?  I've
> encountered this myself (I'm syncing all my vim configuration across
> machines using Dropbox, with symbolic links for .vim/, .vimrc, and
> .gvimrc).
> 
> I see in the latest Mercurial code that mch_is_linked() still only
> checks for hard links.  If it's not already in someone's TODO bucket I
> can work on a fix.  The APIs are straightforward in the versions of
> Windows that support symlinks; I suspect more of the work will be in
> figuring out how to get that support into vim without breaking binary
> compatibility on older systems.  Would the maintainers be interested
> in seeing a patch for this?

A patch definitely helps.  And a way to reproduce the problem.

-- 
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
194. Your business cards contain your e-mail and home page address.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Raspunde prin e-mail lui