On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:21:06 PM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote: > > As I mentioned, the patch uses the existing method of dynamically allocating > MAXPATHL bytes instead of putting it on the stack; I decided it was probably > done for a reason, I just wasn't sure of the reason. I was asking only for > the sake of better understanding of the Vim code. This isn't holding up the > patch, is it?
I just saw patch 509, never mind my premature question :-) -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
