> If :p (on Windows) always produced the expanded long name, then
> :p:8 could be used if someone wanted the short full path.
No.
:echo fnamemodify('C:\Program Files', ':8:p')
C:\PROGRA~1
> I can't see a reason someone would need an 8.3 name expanded
> to anything other than its full long path (with :p), or its
> full short path (with :p:8).
What we want is full long path. Currentl, :p don't return long full long path.
> At any rate, :f does not sound a good mnemonic for "short".
Do you prefer :9 or :) ?
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
