On Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:19:37 PM UTC+1, Michael Tsang wrote:
> diff -ur vim-7.2.245.orig/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim
> vim-7.2.245/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim
> --- vim-7.2.245.orig/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim 2009-12-15 19:17:48.000000000
> +0800
> +++ vim-7.2.245/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim 2009-12-15 19:18:04.000000000
> +0800
> @@ -33,6 +33,14 @@
> syn keyword cppNumber NPOS
> syn keyword cppBoolean true false
>
> +if !exists("cpp_no_cpp0x") " ISO C++0x
> + syn keyword cppOperator alignof
> + syn keyword cppType char16_t char32_t decltype
> + syn keyword cppStorageClass constexpr thread_local
> + syn keyword cppConstant nullptr
> + syn keyword cppStatement static_assert
> +endif
> +
> " The minimum and maximum operators in GNU C++
> syn match cppMinMax "[<>]?"
>
> @@ -54,6 +62,7 @@
> HiLink cppStructure Structure
> HiLink cppNumber Number
> HiLink cppBoolean Boolean
> + HiLink cppConstant Constant
> delcommand HiLink
> endif
Sorry
On Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:19:37 PM UTC+1, Michael Tsang wrote:
> diff -ur vim-7.2.245.orig/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim
> vim-7.2.245/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim
> --- vim-7.2.245.orig/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim 2009-12-15 19:17:48.000000000
> +0800
> +++ vim-7.2.245/runtime/syntax/cpp.vim 2009-12-15 19:18:04.000000000
> +0800
> @@ -33,6 +33,14 @@
> syn keyword cppNumber NPOS
> syn keyword cppBoolean true false
>
> +if !exists("cpp_no_cpp0x") " ISO C++0x
> + syn keyword cppOperator alignof
> + syn keyword cppType char16_t char32_t decltype
> + syn keyword cppStorageClass constexpr thread_local
> + syn keyword cppConstant nullptr
> + syn keyword cppStatement static_assert
> +endif
> +
> " The minimum and maximum operators in GNU C++
> syn match cppMinMax "[<>]?"
>
> @@ -54,6 +62,7 @@
> HiLink cppStructure Structure
> HiLink cppNumber Number
> HiLink cppBoolean Boolean
> + HiLink cppConstant Constant
> delcommand HiLink
> endif
Apologies for reviving such an old post, but this patch seems useful now that
C++ 11 is on the streets and it was never applied. Seems like a small change no
too much intrusive. Maybe the variable "cpp_no_cpp0x" should be renamed to
"cpp_no_cpp11" but apart from that, seems nice.
Best regards
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
