<snip> My change doesn't break behavior of expanding. Just fix(not change) of applying wildignore. When backtick is expanded as filenames, it should be that you wanted. I think backtick is not completion, so wildignore shouldn't affect to backtick. I want to separate expanding and completion. You are talking about completion. I agree that completion should be applied wildignore. But user-own expanding shouldn't be applied.
I don't think, that backtick is applied to wildignore doesn't have any merit to users. When user want to use backtick, they don't expected the behavior. > E480: No match: `='*'` > Shouldn't the backtick-expansion result always be taken literally? It looks > like > it mistakenly performs a glob here! My fix will solve this. > PS: Please bottom-post on this list. I sent e-mail from my handy phone via gmail. So I couldn't change that order. Sorry. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
