Hi Lech! On Mo, 18 Jun 2012, Lech Lorens wrote:
> Not terribly valuable input on the patch but I suppose this: > + ) || curwin->w_buffer == NUL > should in fact read: > + ) || curwin->w_buffer == NULL Yes, indeed. Thanks regards, Christian -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
