ZyX wrote: > Vim bindevalled scope dictionary has the same problem I reported for > extend(). This patch fixes it, though with it case =93masks existing > function=94 is indistinguishable with =93funcref variable must start with > a capital=94. I can make them distinguishable with few more lines if > needed (due to the existence of the first case I never assign function > references to g: or l: variables and believe this is a very bad idea, > thus it does not matter whether or not these cases are > distinguishable).
Thanks, I'll look into it soon. > Also note: while lua interface lacks funcref problems (yet?), it > definitely makes it possible to have g:1 variable. I did not fix it > because I do not know what should be done in this case (and am > familiar neither with lua nor with its C API). Thus sending copy of > this message to Luis Carvalho. Do not know whether some other > interfaces have similar problems. There are probably more like these.. -- The coffee just wasn't strong enough to defend itself -- Tom Waits /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
