On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:39:33PM +0900, Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote: > Sorry, I misunderstood your suggestion. I understood you suggested to > remove hack for Ami. But you suggested to remove hack for IM control > feature. Right? > I think that it is slightly problematic. Although I don't know how many > user depend on it.
Yes, it's not a good solution. ibus won't become inactive when back into normal mode. I'll dig deeper and try to make out another solution later. The option 'imactivatekey' never works here too, only to make the state strange. -- Best regards, lilydjwg Linux Vim Python 我的博客: http://lilydjwg.is-programmer.com/ -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
